Vaginal ring use in a phase 3 microbicide trial: A comparison of objective measures and self-reports of non-adherence in ASPIRE

Document Type

Article (peer-reviewed)

Publication Date



This analysis compares self-reports of product use with objective measures of non-adherence—quarterly plasma dapivirine levels and monthly residual dapivirine (DPV) levels in used rings—in MTN-020/ASPIRE, a phase 3 trial of a monthly DPV vaginal ring among women aged 18–45 years in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. For participants on active product (N = 1211) we assessed self-reported monthly non-adherence, as measured by (1) whether the ring was ever out, and out for ≥ 12 h in the previous month and, (2) by a self-rating scale assessing ability to keep the vaginal ring inserted, and compared the self-reports to two biomarkers of non-use separately and as a composite measure. For this analysis, a plasma DPV value ≤ 95 pg/ml and residual ring ≥ 23.5 mg were used to classify non-adherence (i.e. the ring never being in the vagina the previous month). Compared to self-reports, non-adherence was found to be substantially higher for the composite measure as well as its two components, an indication that ring removal was likely underreported in the trial. The discrepancy between the self-report measure of ring outage and the composite indicator was greater for those aged 18–21 than for those older, evidence that younger women are more likely to underreport non-adherence. Despite underreporting of non-adherence, self-reports of the ring never being out were significant in predicting the composite objective measure. Furthermore, the association between the self-rating scale and the objective measure was in the expected direction and significant, although 11% of those 18–21 and 7% of those 22+ who rated their ability to keep the ring inserted as good, very good or excellent in the 4 weeks prior to exit were considered non-adherent according to the objective measure. This analysis indicates that while self-reports are significantly associated with objective measures of adherence in the ASPIRE trial, they were inflated—more so by those younger—and therefore may have limited utility identifying those who have challenges using products as directed.


ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01617096